Fetal gastroschisis and omphalocele: is cesarean section the best mode of delivery?

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Sep;163(3):773-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91066-l.

Abstract

There has always been controversy regarding the mode of delivery of fetuses with abdominal wall defects. Prior studies may have been biased in this evaluation as a result of the effects of delay in repair, transport of the fetus to level III facilities, and antenatal diagnosis compared with an unsuspected diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate mode of delivery at level III institutions with access to complete care to determine if cesarean section improved outcome. One hundred eight infants were treated in the study period for abdominal wall defects. Fifty-six infants met all criteria for admission to the study. No difference in neonatal morbidity or mortality was identified. No difference was found in infants who were born by elective cesarean section compared with infants delivered after labor ensued. In conclusion, we found no evidence that cesarean section or avoidance of labor improved outcome in fetuses with uncomplicated abdominal wall defects.

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Muscles / abnormalities*
  • Cesarean Section*
  • Female
  • Fetal Diseases / diagnosis
  • Hernia, Umbilical / diagnosis
  • Hernia, Umbilical / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Diagnosis