Comparison of activities of daily living in two different one arm drive wheelchairs: a controlled trial

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(1):75-81. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2011.574247. Epub 2011 Apr 17.

Abstract

Aims: This pilot study measured activities of daily living (ADLs) in users propelling both a standard dual handrim Action 3 wheelchair and a standard Action 3 wheelchair with a Neater Uni-Wheelchair (NUW) kit attachment. The kit consists of a steerable front castor and a single pushrim propelling both rear wheels via a differential.

Hypothesis: There would be a difference in the efficiency of ADL skill performance, speed and heart rate.

Methods: Twenty non-disabled participants simulating hemiplegia were used in a cross over, repeated measures trial. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) of users undertaking making a bed and laying a table 'Swedish style', tasks, were measured. Heart rate at rest and post-task and time taken to complete each task were recorded.

Results: Heart rate when laying the table was lower in the NUW (p < 0.005) and task completion time was quicker (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in motor and process ability skills.

Conclusion: ADL tasks in the NUW were completed more efficiently with no loss in quality of motor and process skills performance. This suggests that the NUW is a viable alternative to current one arm drive provision.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living*
  • Adult
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Ergonomics
  • Female
  • Heart Rate
  • Hemiplegia / rehabilitation*
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motor Activity / physiology
  • Pilot Projects
  • Rest
  • Task Performance and Analysis
  • Wheelchairs*
  • Young Adult