Eight-year wear analysis in Longevity highly cross-linked polyethylene liners comparing 26- and 32-mm heads

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Dec;131(12):1731-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1360-z. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

Abstract

Introduction: Although wear reduction of highly cross-linked polyethylene has been demonstrated to be independent of femoral head diameter in some simulation studies, the clinical effects of femoral head diameter on wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene sockets remain unclear. We compared the in vivo wear of Longevity highly cross-linked polyethylene liners at 8-year follow-up using 26- or 32-mm cobalt-chromium heads.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 90 cementless total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using Longevity highly cross-linked polyethylene liners combined with 26- (45 THAs) or 32-mm (45 THAs) cobalt-chromium heads. Annual radiographs were analyzed using PolyWare computer-assisted methods and linear and volumetric total head penetration rates and linear and volumetric steady-state wear rates were compared.

Results: The two groups showed similar background data, and no significant differences were identified between groups in total head penetration rate or steady-state wear rate. Steady-state wear rates were negligible. Osteolysis was not observed in any hips in either group.

Conclusions: At the 8-year follow-up, wear of the Longevity was the same irrespective of the use 26- or 32-mm heads.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polyethylene*
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Polyethylene