[The unresolved issue of false-positive D-dimer results in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism]

Rev Med Suisse. 2011 Aug 24;7(305):1588-92.
[Article in French]

Abstract

The unresolved issue of false-positive D-dimer results in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a difficult diagnosis as it lacks specific symptoms and clinical signs. After the determination of the pretest PE probability by a validated clinical score, D-dimers (DD) is the initial blood test in the majority of patients whose probability is low or intermediate. The low specificity of DD results in a high number of false-positives that then require thoracic angio-CT. A new clinical decision rule, called the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out criteria (PERC), identifies patients at such low risk that PE can be safely ruled-out without a DD test. Its safety has been confirmed in US emergency departments, but retrospective European studies showed that it would lead to 5-7% of undiagnosed PE. Alternative strategies are needed to reduce the proportion of false-positive DD results.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Antifibrinolytic Agents / analysis*
  • Biomarkers / analysis
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products / analysis*
  • Humans
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Antifibrinolytic Agents
  • Biomarkers
  • Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products
  • fibrin fragment D