Discrepancies in the concordance of self-reported vision status and visual acuity in the Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study

Ophthalmology. 2012 Jan;119(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the association between self-rated vision and distance visual acuity by race and other factors.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis within a longitudinal, population-based cohort study.

Participants and controls: Two thousand five hundred twenty individuals, 65 to 84 years of age, including 666 black participants and 1854 white participants.

Methods: All participants reported their self-rated vision score. Binocular distance visual acuity was assessed. Based on the level of visual acuity and the self-reported vision score, participants were placed into concordant and discrepant groups.

Main outcome measures: Multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the characteristics associated with concordant and discrepant groups.

Results: Black participants were more likely to be represented in the discordant group that reported good vision but had acuity worse than 20/40. In the multivariate analysis, a per-year decrement in years of education received increased the odds of being in both discrepant groups, one that reported good vision but had a visual acuity worse than 20/40 (odds ratio, 1.21; P<0.0001) and the other discrepant group that reported bad vision but had a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (odds ratio, 1.04; P<0.0001). A per-year decrement in years of education received also seemed to explain the excess risk of black race in the discrepant group that reported good vision but had a visual acuity worse than 20/40.

Conclusions: Given the socioeconomically driven discrepancies in self-reported vision status, self-reported vision status should be used cautiously in surveillance surveys, especially when assessing vision inequalities between socioeconomic groups.

Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Black or African American*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diagnostic Self Evaluation*
  • Educational Status
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment
  • Health Status*
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Maryland / epidemiology
  • Social Class
  • Vision Disorders / ethnology*
  • Vision Disorders / physiopathology
  • Vision Tests
  • Vision, Binocular / physiology*
  • Visual Acuity / physiology*
  • White People*