Hand and wrist research productivity in journals with high impact factors: a 20 year analysis

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Mar;37(3):275-83. doi: 10.1177/1753193411420057. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

Abstract

Bibliometric analyses, which study trends in research productivity, have not previously been applied to hand and wrist research. This study analyses temporal and geographic trends in hand and wrist research from 1988 to 2007. Original research articles were collected from seven English language journals selected on the basis of impact factor. Research production and quality (level of evidence) were determined by country and global region. Linear regression analysis was used to investigate trends. No significant increase in research volume was observed, but journal impact factors have risen significantly since 1988. Western Europe contributed significantly more high-quality (Level I and II) studies than the United States. Research contributions show a geographical distribution concentrated in the US and Western Europe, but considerable changes in this distribution have occurred. From 1988 to 2007, there was a relative increase in research production from Europe, Latin America and Asia, and a relative decline from the US.

MeSH terms

  • Bibliometrics
  • Biomedical Research / statistics & numerical data*
  • Efficiency
  • Hand
  • Humans
  • Journal Impact Factor*
  • Wrist