Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea: mandibular advancement device therapy

Eur Respir J. 2012 May;39(5):1241-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00144711. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

Abstract

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) represent the main non-continuous positive airway pressure (non-CPAP) therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim of the European Respiratory Society Task Force was to review the evidence in favour of MAD therapy. Effects of tongue-retaining devices are not included in this report. Custom-made MADs reduce apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) and daytime sleepiness compared with placebo devices. CPAP more effectively diminishes AHI, while increasing data suggest fairly similar outcomes in relation to symptoms and cardiovascular health from these treatments. Patients often prefer MADs to CPAP. Milder cases and patients with a proven increase in upper airway size as a result of mandibular advancement are most likely to experience treatment success with MADs. A custom-made device titrated from an initial 50% of maximum mandibular advancement has been recommended. More research is needed to define the patients who will benefit from MAD treatment compared with CPAP, in terms of the effects on sleep-disordered breathing and on other diseases related to OSA. In conclusion, MADs are recommended for patients with mild to moderate OSA (Recommendation Level A) and for those who do not tolerate CPAP. The treatment must be followed up and the device adjusted or exchanged in relation to the outcome.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure*
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / therapy
  • Male
  • Mandibular Advancement / instrumentation*
  • Patient Compliance
  • Patient Preference
  • Quality of Life
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sleep Apnea Syndromes / therapy
  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive / therapy*
  • Sleep Stages
  • Treatment Outcome