Single-pill vs free-equivalent combination therapies for hypertension: a meta-analysis of health care costs and adherence

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Dec;13(12):898-909. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00550.x. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

Abstract

This meta-analysis compares health care resource use costs, adherence, and persistence between groups of patients taking antihypertensives as single-pill combinations (SPCs) vs free-equivalent components (FEC) based on a structured review of published studies. The search yielded 12 retrospective database studies included in analyses. The mean difference in combined total annual all-cause and hypertension-related health care costs was $1357 (95% confidence interval [CI], $778-$1935) lower in favor of SPC than FEC groups. Adherence, measured as the mean difference in medication possession ratio, was estimated to be 8% higher for patients naive to prior antihypertensives and 14% higher for nonnaive SPC patients compared with corresponding FEC patients. Persistence in the SPC groups was twice as likely as the FEC groups (pooled risk ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1). Improved adherence and persistence may have contributed to the lower costs in the SPC groups via improved clinical outcomes.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antihypertensive Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antihypertensive Agents / economics
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / economics
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / statistics & numerical data
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / drug therapy*
  • Hypertension / economics
  • Medication Adherence / statistics & numerical data*
  • Pharmacies / economics
  • Pharmacies / statistics & numerical data
  • United States

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents