[Validation of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs in primary care]

Rev Med Interne. 2012 May;33(5):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are often managed on an outpatient basis. The aim of the study was to validate a clinical prediction rule specifically for use in primary care to help physicians in their decision to start anticoagulant therapy while awaiting ultrasound examination.

Patients and methods: Between September 2007 and October 2008, 194 general practitioners prospectively included patients with clinically suspected DVT without clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. All patients underwent a standardized clinical assessment in order to collect items included in the clinical prediction rule (personal history of venous thromboembolism +1, immobilization in previous month+1, estrogen contraceptive+2, active malignancy+3, swelling of the calf+1, the presence of an alternative diagnosis more likely than that of DVT-3. DVT unlikely if score<2, likely if score≥2).

Results: Among the 164 included patients, 56 (34%) had DVT of them 28 (17%) had a proximal DVT. Proportions of confirmed DVT were 29% in the unlikely group and 43% in the likely group against 26% and 63% respectively in the derivation study.

Conclusions: This clinical prediction rule might not fulfill the required conditions to be considered as a usable help in the ambulatory management of DVT. Variations of the cut-off value could enhance its performance.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leg / blood supply*
  • Male
  • Primary Health Care*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Venous Thrombosis / diagnosis*