Aortic valve stenosis after previous coronary bypass: transcatheter valve implantation or aortic valve replacement?

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 May 29:7:47. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-47.

Abstract

We report a prospective comparison between transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI, n = 13) and surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR, n = 10) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). All patients had at least bilateral patent internal thoracic arteries bypass without indication of repeat revascularization. After a similar post-procedure outcome, despite one early death in TAVI group, the 1-year survival was 100% in surgical group and in transfemoral TAVI group, and 73% in transapical TAVI group. When previous CABG is the lone surgical risk factor, indications for a TAVI procedure have to be cautious, specially if transfemoral approach is not possible.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis / surgery*
  • Cardiac Catheterization / methods*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / methods*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / methods*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome