[Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: comparison with abdominal myomectomy]

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Sep;41(5):439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objective: To compare morbidity of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus those performed by laparotomy.

Patients and methods: It reports a monocentric retrospective case matched analysis enrolling 22 patients (six laparotomic and 16 robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomies), needing a surgical treatment for at least one myoma oversizing 6cm.

Results: Both patient groups were comparable regarding their age, their weight and myoma's size. There were more complications in the laparotomy group in comparison with the robotic group (66.7%, versus 0%; P=0.002). Average intraoperative blood losses were respectively 397±377mL versus 387±349mL (P=0.71) and length of stay 7.2±0.8 days versus 3.9±2.8 days (P<0.001). None of the robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy needed any conversion to laparotomy.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy seems to be feasible for heavy fibroids, with a lower morbidity in comparison with laparotomy. These results must be confirmed by several wider prospective studies.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Female
  • France
  • Humans
  • Intraoperative Complications
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Leiomyoma / surgery
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotics*
  • Uterine Myomectomy / methods*
  • Uterine Neoplasms / surgery