[Self-ligating vs. conventional brackets in the treatment of patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion: a clinical trial of dental and cephalometric analysis]

Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;47(3):139-43. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2012.03.003.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To compare the dental and skeletal changes in patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion treated with self-ligating and conventional bracket systems.

Methods: Forty patients with Class II division 2 malocclusion were treated non-extraction. Half of them were treated with self-ligating brackets and the others were treated with conventional brackets. The dental casts and lateral cephalometric radiophotographs were analyzed before and after treatment.

Results: Significant increase in inter premolar widths, arch lengths, U1-NA, L1-MP and arch perimeters were noted after orthodontic treatment in both groups. Statistically greater increase in upper inter-first premolar [(4.45 ± 2.60) mm] was found in self-ligating group than in conventional group [(2.41 ± 2.74) mm, P < 0.05]. Stepwise regression analysis indicated that the increase in arch length and arch width contributed to the increase in arch perimeter.

Conclusions: There were an overall increase in arch widths and lengths in patients treated with self-ligating and conventional bracktets. However, more arch width increase was found in self-ligating group than in conventional group.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cephalometry
  • Child
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II / diagnostic imaging
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II / therapy*
  • Orthodontic Brackets*
  • Orthodontics, Corrective*
  • Radiography, Dental
  • Regression Analysis
  • Young Adult