Criteria and limitations for selecting a sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Apr;115(4):455-65. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to elucidate the criteria and limitations for selecting a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) alone for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite.

Study design: The relationship between the mandibular relapse after 1 year and the extent of vertical movement following SSRO alone was investigated for patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite and the criteria were determined.

Results: The limitation in SSRO alone was found to be 3-mm vertical movement at the gonion. There was a significant difference in the mandibular relapse between the patients with >3-mm change and <3-mm change.

Conclusions: For patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism and open bite, if the vertical movement at the gonion is <3 mm, SSRO alone could be an effective treatment. However, if the movement is >3 mm, SSRO alone should be avoided and bimaxillary osteotomies may be a preferable treatment.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cephalometry / methods
  • Chin / pathology
  • Decision Making*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mandible / pathology
  • Mandible / surgery*
  • Maxilla / surgery
  • Open Bite / surgery*
  • Osteotomy, Le Fort / methods
  • Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus / methods*
  • Patient Care Planning
  • Prognathism / surgery*
  • Recurrence
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Vertical Dimension
  • Young Adult