Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):335-9. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318270ade3.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to report on the costs, operative times, and length of stay for robotic and open sacrocolpopexy.

Study design: This retrospective study compares consecutive open and robotic sacrocolpopexies that were performed beyond the surgical learning curve. Hospital direct costs, operative times, and length of stay were compared for the 2 groups. Robot cost and maintenance were included. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.

Results: The study comprised 91 open and 73 robotic sacrocolpopexies. Both groups were similar clinically. Median operative times for open and robotic approaches were 166 and 212 minutes (P < 0.001), respectively, and length of stay was 3 versus 2 days (P < 0.001). Of the women in the robotic group, 48% had length of stay less than 24 hours versus 1% in the open group. Median robotic and open procedure direct costs were $6668 and $7804 (P = 0.002), respectively. Readmission rates at 30 days postoperatively were similar.

Conclusions: Robotic sacrocolpopexy costs less but takes slightly longer to perform than the open procedure.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / economics*
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Hospital Costs
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Patient Readmission / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotics / economics*
  • Suture Techniques
  • Uterine Prolapse / economics*
  • Uterine Prolapse / surgery*