Source control review in clinical trials of anti-infective agents in complicated intra-abdominal infections

Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;56(12):1765-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit128. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Abstract

In clinical trials of complicated intra-abdominal infections, assessment of adequacy of the initial surgical approach to the management of the infection is of considerable importance in determining outcome. Antibiotic therapy would not be expected to adequately treat the infection if the surgical procedure was inadequate with respect to source control. Inclusion of such cases in an efficacy analysis of a particular therapeutic antibiotic may confound the results. We analyzed the source control review process used in double-blind clinical trials of antibiotics in complicated intra-abdominal infections identified through systematic review. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify relevant articles reporting results from double-blind clinical trials that used a source control review process. Eight prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, clinical trials of 5 anti-infective agents in complicated intra-abdominal infections used a source control review process. We provide recommendations for an independent, adjudicated source control review process applicable to future clinical trials.

Keywords: adjudication; intra-abdominal infections; review board; source control.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Infective Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / standards
  • Consensus
  • Humans
  • Intraabdominal Infections / drug therapy*
  • Intraabdominal Infections / surgery*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards
  • Research Design

Substances

  • Anti-Infective Agents