Background: The optimal therapy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is controversial. We evaluated three different strategies for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA), paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty (PEBA) and cutting balloon followed by paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty (CB+PEBA).
Methods: Forty-five coronary arteries in 45 mini-pigs underwent oversized bare-metal stent (stent-to-artery ratio, 1.2:1) implantation to induce in-stent restenosis. After 28 days, vessels with in-stent restenosis (≥50% diameter stenosis) were randomly divided into three groups: CBA, PEBA and CB+PEBA. In vivo angiography was performed before intervention, immediately after intervention and at 28-day follow-up. Stented arteries were harvested for pathological analyses. The proliferation and apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining and the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay, respectively.
Results: Acute lumen gain was not different between the three groups. Late lumen loss and neointimal area at follow-up were lower for CB+PEBA compared with CBA but similar for CB+PEBA compared with PEBA. There were no significant differences in proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive vascular smooth muscle cells and TUNEL-positive vascular smooth muscle cells between the CB+PEBA and PEBA groups.
Conclusions: PEBA with or without cutting balloon was superior to CBA alone for in-stent restenosis. The underlying mechanism was probably related to inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. In this porcine coronary artery restenosis model, PEBA with or without cutting balloon was superior.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.