Ecosystem function in Appalachian headwater streams during an active invasion by the hemlock woolly adelgid

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061171. Print 2013.

Abstract

Forested ecosystems in the southeastern United States are currently undergoing an invasion by the hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA). Previous studies in this area have shown changes to forest structure, decreases in canopy cover, increases in organic matter, and changes to nutrient cycling on the forest floor and soil. Here, we were interested in how the effects of canopy loss and nutrient leakage from terrestrial areas would translate into functional changes in streams draining affected watersheds. We addressed these questions in HWA-infested watersheds at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in North Carolina. Specifically, we measured stream metabolism (gross primary production and ecosystem respiration) and nitrogen uptake from 2008 to 2011 in five streams across the Coweeta basin. Over the course of our study, we found no change to in-stream nutrient concentrations. While canopy cover decreased annually in these watersheds, this change in light penetration did not translate to higher rates of in-stream primary production during the summer months of our study. We found a trend towards greater heterotrophy within our watersheds, where in-stream respiration accounted for a much larger component of net ecosystem production than GPP. Additionally, increases in rhododendron cover may counteract changes in light and nutrient availability that occurred with hemlock loss. The variability in our metabolic and uptake parameters suggests an actively-infested ecosystem in transition between steady states.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Appalachian Region
  • Biological Transport
  • Ecosystem*
  • Hemiptera*
  • Introduced Species*
  • Light
  • Nitrogen / metabolism
  • Rivers*
  • Trees / growth & development
  • Trees / metabolism
  • Trees / radiation effects

Substances

  • Nitrogen

Grants and funding

This research was supported by a National Science Foundation award DEB-02218001 and DEB-0823293 from the Long Term Ecological Research Program to the Coweeta LTER Program at the University of Georgia. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the University of Georgia. Funding was also provided by a grant from the United States Forest Service. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.