Vascularized free forearm flap versus free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for reconstruction in patients with head and neck cancer: assessment of quality of life

Head Neck. 2013 Dec;35(12):1808-13. doi: 10.1002/hed.23254. Epub 2013 May 3.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the quality of life of Chinese patients with malignant tumors who had undergone immediate free flap reconstruction surgery. In addition, we compared 2 groups of patients: those who had received radial forearm free flap surgery and others who had received free anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery.

Methods: Quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form-36 (MOS SF-36) and the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaires 12 months after reconstruction.

Results: A total of 121 of 163 questionnaires were returned (74.2%). There were significant differences between the 2 groups in the T classification (p < .005). Patients reconstructed with free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps performed better in the appearance and shoulder domains, and the role emotion and social functioning domains.

Conclusions: Using either radial forearm free flaps or free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for reconstruction of head and neck defects after cancer resection significantly influences a patient's quality of life.

Keywords: free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps; head and neck cancer; quality of life; radial forearm free flaps.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Emotions
  • Esthetics
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Forearm
  • Free Tissue Flaps* / blood supply
  • Humans
  • Interpersonal Relations
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mouth Neoplasms / psychology*
  • Mouth Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Perforator Flap*
  • Quality of Life*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Thigh
  • Young Adult