Cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance improves medical students' adherence to guidelines in simulated cardiac arrest: a randomised cross-over study

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Dec;30(12):752-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328362147f.

Abstract

Background: The 2010 Resuscitation Guidelines require high-quality chest compression and rapid defibrillation for patients with ventricular fibrillation with rhythm analysis and defibrillation repeated every 2 min. A lack of adherence to the guidelines by medical students was observed during simulated resuscitation training.

Objectives: To assess whether real-time cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance, including an audiovisual countdown timer, a metronome, a display of the chest compression quality and voice prompts, might improve adherence to the guidelines by medical students.

Design: Randomised cross-over simulation study.

Setting: Studienhospital Münster, Faculty of Medicine University Münster, Germany

Participants: One hundred and forty-one medical students (fifth year) in 47 teams.

Intervention: Simulated resuscitation with and without real-time cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance.

Main outcome measures: The preshock pause, postshock pause, fraction of time without chest compression and defibrillation intervals. Observed quality parameters were chest compression depth and chest compression rate.

Results: With real-time cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance, there were improved mean (SD) chest compression rates (105 ± 8 vs. 121 ± 12 bpm; P < 0.005), fewer inappropriate shock intervals [median (interquartile range) 0 (1 to 5) vs. 4 (1 to 7); P < 0.005], a smaller fraction of time without chest compression (18.9 ± 4.4 vs. 22.5 ± 7.0%; P < 0.005) and shorter postshock pauses (2.3 ± 0.9 vs. 3.4 ± 1.2 s; P < 0.005).

Conclusion: Real-time cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance significantly increased adherence to the guidelines by medical students treating simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Using a simple tool such as a countdown timer makes it possible to reduce the number of inappropriate shock intervals and time without chest compression.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / education*
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / methods
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / standards
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Education, Medical / methods
  • Female
  • Germany
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Manikins
  • Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest / therapy*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Students, Medical*
  • Time Factors
  • Ventricular Fibrillation / therapy