Effects of intraduodenal lipid and protein on gut motility and hormone release, glycemia, appetite, and energy intake in lean men

Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Aug;98(2):300-11. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.061333. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

Abstract

Background: Intraduodenal lipid modulates gastrointestinal motility and hormone release and suppresses energy intake (EI) more than does intraduodenal glucose. Oral protein is the most satiating macronutrient and modulates postprandial glycemia; the comparative effects of intraduodenal protein and lipid and their combined effects are unclear.

Objective: We investigated the effects of intraduodenal protein and lipid, alone or in combination, on antropyloroduodenal motility, gastrointestinal hormone release, glycemia, and EI.

Design: Twenty lean men were studied on 5 randomized, double-blind occasions. Antropyloroduodenal motility, cholecystokinin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), insulin, glucagon, blood glucose, appetite, and nausea were measured during 90-min isocaloric (3 kcal/min) intraduodenal infusions of lipid [pure lipid condition (L3)], protein [pure protein condition (P3)], a 2:1 combination of lipid and protein [2:1 lipid:protein condition (L2P1)], a 1:2 combination of lipid and protein [1:2 lipid:protein condition (L1P2)], or a control. Immediately after the infusion, EI from a buffet lunch was quantified.

Results: In comparison with the control, all nutrient infusions suppressed antral and duodenal and stimulated pyloric pressures (P < 0.05). Cholecystokinin and GLP-1 release and pyloric stimulation were lipid-load dependent (r ≥ 0.39, P < 0.01), insulin and glucagon releases were protein-load dependent (r = 0.83, P < 0.001), and normoglycemia was maintained. L3 but not P3 increased nausea (P < 0.05). Compared with the control, L3 and P3 but not L2P1 or L1P2 suppressed EI (P < 0.05) without major effects on appetite.

Conclusions: In lean men, despite differing effects on gut function, intraduodenal lipid and protein produce comparable reductions in energy intake. The effects of lipid may be a result of nausea. Protein also regulates blood glucose by stimulating insulin and glucagon. In contrast, at the loads selected, lipid:protein combinations did not suppress energy intake, suggesting that a threshold load is required to elicit effects. This trial was registered at Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.anzctr.org.au) as 12609000949280.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Appetite / physiology*
  • Blood Glucose / physiology*
  • Body Mass Index
  • Cholecystokinin / blood
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dietary Fats / administration & dosage*
  • Dietary Proteins / administration & dosage*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Energy Intake*
  • Gastrointestinal Hormones / blood
  • Gastrointestinal Motility*
  • Gastrointestinal Tract / physiology
  • Glucagon / blood
  • Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 / blood
  • Humans
  • Insulin / blood
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • New Zealand
  • Postprandial Period
  • Satiation
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Dietary Fats
  • Dietary Proteins
  • Gastrointestinal Hormones
  • Insulin
  • Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
  • Glucagon
  • Cholecystokinin