Rationale and objectives: Numerous protocols have been developed to reduce cardiac computed tomography angiography (cCTA) radiation dose while maintaining image quality. However, cCTA practice is highly dependent on physician and technologist experience and education. In this study, we sought to evaluate the incremental value of real-time feedback via weekly dose reports on a busy cCTA service.
Materials and methods: This time series analysis consisted of 450 consecutive patients whom underwent physician-supervised cCTA for clinically indicated native coronary evaluation between April 2011 and January 2013, with 150 patients before the initiation of weekly dose report (preintervention period: April-September 2011) and 150 patients after the initiation (postintervention period: September 2011-February 2012). To assess whether overall dose reductions were maintained over time, results were compared to a late control group consisting of 150 consecutive cCTA exams, which were performed after the study (September 2012-January 2013). Patient characteristics and effective radiation were recorded and compared.
Results: Total radiation dose was significantly lower in the postintervention period (3.4 mSv [1.7-5.7] and in the late control group (3.3 mSv [2.0-5.3] versus the preintervention period (4.1 mSv [2.1-6.6] (P = .005). The proportion of high-dose outliers was also decreased in the postintervention period and late control period (exams <10 mSv were 88.0% preintervention vs. 97.3% postintervention vs. 95.3% late control; exams <15 mSv were 98.0% preintervention vs. 100.0% postintervention vs. 98.7% late control; exams <20.0 mSv were 98.7% preintervention vs. 100.0% postintervention vs. 100.0% late control).
Conclusion: Weekly dose report feedback of site radiation doses to patients undergoing physician-supervised cCTA resulted in significant overall dose reduction and reduction of high-dose outliers. Overall dose reductions were maintained beyond the initial study period.
Keywords: Coronary CT angiography; process improvement; quality improvement; radiation dose.
Copyright © 2013 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.