Clinical outcome of redo operation on aortic root

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;62(4):215-20. doi: 10.1007/s11748-013-0332-3. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

Abstract

Background: With the increasing use of biologic conduits or bioprosthetic valve, the number of patients who require redo operation on aortic root increased.

Methods: In the past 22 years, 14 patients underwent redo operation on aortic root. The mean age was 61.9 ± 14.8 years. Previous operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 4), aortic root replacement with subcoronary technique (n = 3) and Bentall operation (n = 7). The operation interval was 5.4 ± 6.4 years. Indication for redo operation included structural valve deterioration (n = 6), prosthetic valve endocarditis (n = 4), perivalvular leakage (n = 2), dilatation of sinus of Valsalva (n = 1) and dehiscence of proximal anastomosis line (n = 1). Mean follow-up period was 5.3 ± 5.2 years.

Results: Present operations were full root replacement with stentless valve (n = 5) and Bentall operation (n = 9). There was one in-hospital death (7.1 %) caused by arrhythmia. Postoperative complications included implantation of permanent pacemaker (n = 3), arrhythmia (n = 2) and re-intubation (n = 1). The 5-year survival was 92.9 ± 6.9%. Freedom from redo aortic operation at 5 years was 100%.

Conclusion: Redo operation on aortic root can be performed with acceptable in-hospital mortality and good late survival.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aorta, Thoracic / surgery*
  • Aortic Valve / surgery*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation*
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome