HIV lipodystrophy in participants randomised to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) +2-3 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTI) or LPV/r + raltegravir as second-line antiretroviral therapy

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077138. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Objective: To compare changes over 48 weeks in body fat, lipids, Metabolic Syndrome and cardiovascular disease risk between patients randomised 1:1 to lopinavir/ritonavir (r/LPV) plus raltegravir (RAL) compared to r/LPV plus 2-3 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (N(t)RTIs) as second-line therapy.

Methods: Participants were HIV-1 positive (>16 years) failing first-line treatment (2 consecutive HIV RNA >500 copies/mL) of NNRTI +2N(t)RTI. Whole body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was performed at baseline and week 48. Data were obtained to calculate the Metabolic Syndrome and Framingham cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score. Linear regression was used to compare mean differences between arms. Logistic regression compared incidence of metabolic syndrome. Associations between percent limb fat changes at 48 weeks with baseline variables were assessed by backward stepwise multivariate linear regression. Analyses were adjusted for gender, body mass index and smoking status.

Results: 210 participants were randomised. The mean (95% CI) increase in limb fat over 48 weeks was 15.7% (5.3, 25.9) or 0.9 kg (0.2, 1.5) in the r/LPV+N(t)RTI arm and 21.1% (11.1, 31,1) or 1.3 kg (0.7, 1.9) in the r/LPV+RAL arm, with no significant difference between treatment arms (-5.4% [-0.4 kg], p>0.1). Increases in total body fat mass (kg) and trunk fat mass (kg) were also similar between groups. Total:HDL cholesterol ratio was significantly higher in the RAL arm (mean difference -0.4 (1.4); p = 0.03), there were no other differences in lipid parameters between treatment arms. There were no statistically significant differences in CVD risk or incidence of Metabolic Syndrome between the two treatment arms. The baseline predictors of increased limb fat were high viral load, high insulin and participant's not taking lipid lowering treatment.

Conclusion: In patients switching to second line therapy, r/LPV combined with RAL demonstrated similar improvements in limb fat as an N(t)RTI + r/LPV regimen, but a worse total:HDL cholesterol ratio over 48 weeks.

Trial registration: This clinical trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, registry number NCT00931463 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ ct2/show/NCT00931463?term = NCT00931463&rank = 1.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-HIV Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Body Fat Distribution
  • Body Mass Index
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / drug therapy
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / etiology
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / metabolism
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / pathology
  • Cholesterol / blood
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • HIV Infections / complications
  • HIV Infections / drug therapy*
  • HIV Infections / metabolism
  • HIV Infections / pathology
  • HIV-1 / drug effects
  • HIV-1 / physiology
  • Humans
  • Lipodystrophy / complications
  • Lipodystrophy / drug therapy*
  • Lipodystrophy / metabolism
  • Lipodystrophy / pathology
  • Logistic Models
  • Lopinavir / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Metabolic Syndrome / drug therapy
  • Metabolic Syndrome / etiology
  • Metabolic Syndrome / metabolism
  • Metabolic Syndrome / pathology
  • Middle Aged
  • Pyrrolidinones / therapeutic use*
  • RNA, Viral / antagonists & inhibitors
  • RNA, Viral / biosynthesis
  • Raltegravir Potassium
  • Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Risk Factors
  • Ritonavir / therapeutic use*
  • Viral Load / drug effects
  • Virus Replication / drug effects

Substances

  • Anti-HIV Agents
  • Pyrrolidinones
  • RNA, Viral
  • Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
  • Lopinavir
  • Raltegravir Potassium
  • Cholesterol
  • Ritonavir

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00931463

Grants and funding

Funding for the Second-line study was provided by The Kirby Institute, Merck & Co. Inc., AbbVie Pty Ltd, NHMRC, and amfAR. The Kirby Institute was the sponsor and played a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish and preparation of the manuscript. Merck & Co and AbbVie had a representative on the Protocol Steering Committee but had no role in study design or data collection. They did review the analysis plan and manuscript, but did not draft these documents. NHMRC and amfAR had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.