A critical appraisal of systemic treatment options for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014 Apr;90(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Abstract

Current guidelines provide most support for the use of temsirolimus in first line therapy for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). However, this recommendation is based on scant level 2a evidence. The objective of this review is to examine the evidence supporting first line temsirolimus use in patients with metastatic nccRCC as well as alternative first line treatment options. Six studies, that assessed the efficacy of five agents qualified for inclusion. Among recognized treatment options for metastatic nccRCC, mean weighted progression free survival values of 7.9 months for temsirolimus vs. 7.3 for sunitinib vs. 8.5 months for sorafenib vs. ≈4.1 months for erlotinib were recorded based on data from 10, 74, 33 and 51 patients respectively. In conclusion, the data supporting first line temsirolimus for metastatic nccRCC are based on a small patient sample. Sunitinib's efficacy is similar to that of temsirolimus but is based on a bigger patient sample that originates from phase II studies.

Keywords: Chromophobe; Metastatic; Non-clear cell; Papillary; Renal cell carcinoma; Sorafenib; Sunitinib; Systemic therapy; Targeted therapy; Temsirolimus.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell / drug therapy*
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell / metabolism
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell / pathology
  • Humans
  • Kidney Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Kidney Neoplasms / metabolism
  • Kidney Neoplasms / pathology
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy*

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents

Supplementary concepts

  • Clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma