Pupillary light reaction during high altitude exposure

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087889. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to quantify the pupillary light reaction during high altitude exposure using the state of the art Compact Integrated Pupillograph (CIP) and to investigate a potential correlation of altered pupil reaction with severity of acute mountain sickness (AMS). This work is related to the Tübingen High Altitude Ophthalmology (THAO) study.

Methods: Parameters of pupil dynamics (initial diameter, amplitude, relative amplitude, latency, constriction velocity) were quantified in 14 healthy volunteers at baseline (341 m) and high altitude (4559 m) over several days using the CIP. Scores of AMS, peripheral oxygen saturation and heart rate were assessed for respective correlations with pupil dynamics. For statistical analysis JMP was used and data are shown in terms of intra-individual normalized values (value during exposure/value at baseline) and the 95% confidence interval for each time point.

Results: During high altitude exposure the initial diameter size was significantly reduced (p<0.05). In contrast, the amplitude, the relative amplitude and the contraction velocity of the light reaction were significantly increased (p<0.05) on all days measured at high altitude. The latency did not show any significant differences at high altitude compared to baseline recordings. Changes in pupil parameters did not correlate with scores of AMS.

Conclusions: Key parameters of the pupillary light reaction are significantly altered at high altitude. We hypothesize that high altitude hypoxia itself as well as known side effects of high altitude exposure such as fatigue or exhaustion after ascent may account for an altered pupillogram. Interestingly, none of these changes are related to AMS.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Altitude Sickness / physiopathology
  • Altitude*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pupil / physiology*
  • Reflex, Pupillary*

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Wilderness Medical Society (WMS) with the Charles S. Houston Research Award. Additional unconditional grants were provided by Novartis, Bausch & Lomb, Alcon, Allergan, Ursapharm, IMS Gear and OptimaPharma and Heidelberg Engineering. The CIP was provided by AMTech, Dossenheim, Germany. The study also received private donations by Martin Rohrbach, Till Schoeffel, Ulrich Gekeler, Christina Fasser, Eduard Schatz und Norbert Willmann. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.