High-content, high-throughput screening for the identification of cytotoxic compounds based on cell morphology and cell proliferation markers

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e88338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088338. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Toxicity is a major cause of failure in drug discovery and development, and whilst robust toxicological testing occurs, efficiency could be improved if compounds with cytotoxic characteristics were identified during primary compound screening. The use of high-content imaging in primary screening is becoming more widespread, and by utilising phenotypic approaches it should be possible to incorporate cytotoxicity counter-screens into primary screens. Here we present a novel phenotypic assay that can be used as a counter-screen to identify compounds with adverse cellular effects. This assay has been developed using U2OS cells, the PerkinElmer Operetta high-content/high-throughput imaging system and Columbus image analysis software. In Columbus, algorithms were devised to identify changes in nuclear morphology, cell shape and proliferation using DAPI, TOTO-3 and phosphohistone H3 staining, respectively. The algorithms were developed and tested on cells treated with doxorubicin, taxol and nocodazole. The assay was then used to screen a novel, chemical library, rich in natural product-like molecules of over 300 compounds, 13.6% of which were identified as having adverse cellular effects. This assay provides a relatively cheap and rapid approach for identifying compounds with adverse cellular effects during screening assays, potentially reducing compound rejection due to toxicity in subsequent in vitro and in vivo assays.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Biological Products / adverse effects
  • Biological Products / toxicity
  • Cell Line
  • Cell Proliferation / drug effects*
  • Cell Shape / drug effects*
  • Drug Evaluation, Preclinical / methods*
  • High-Throughput Screening Assays / methods*
  • Humans
  • Small Molecule Libraries / adverse effects
  • Small Molecule Libraries / toxicity
  • Software

Substances

  • Biological Products
  • Small Molecule Libraries

Grants and funding

This study was supported by The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (www.epsrc.ac.uk) EP/F043503/1 and The Biomedical Health Research Centre at Leeds www.bhrc.ac.uk). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.