The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index

Michael Walsh; Sadeesh K Srinathan; Daniel F McAuley; Marko Mrkobrada; Oren Levine; Christine Ribic; Amber O Molnar; Neil D Dattani; Andrew Burke; Gordon Guyatt; Lehana Thabane; Stephen D Walter; Janice Pogue; P J Devereaux

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019

The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019. Epub 2014 Feb 5.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L2X2. Electronic address: [email protected].
² Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Health Sciences Centre, GE611 Sherbrooke St., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A1R9.
³ Centre for Infection and Immunity, Queen's University of Belfast, Health Sciences Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT97BL, UK; Regional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Victoria Hospital, 274 Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT126BA, UK.
⁴ Department of Medicine, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windemere Road, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5.
⁵ Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8.
⁶ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8.
⁷ Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital, Riverside Campus, 1967 Riverside Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H7W9.
⁸ Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 Kings College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S1A8.
⁹ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8.
¹⁰ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L2X2.
¹¹ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S4L8; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L2X2.

PMID: 24508144
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019

Abstract

Objectives: A P-value <0.05 is one metric used to evaluate the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We wondered how often statistically significant results in RCTs may be lost with small changes in the numbers of outcomes.

Study design and setting: A review of RCTs in high-impact medical journals that reported a statistically significant result for at least one dichotomous or time-to-event outcome in the abstract. In the group with the smallest number of events, we changed the status of patients without an event to an event until the P-value exceeded 0.05. We labeled this number the Fragility Index; smaller numbers indicated a more fragile result.

Results: The 399 eligible trials had a median sample size of 682 patients (range: 15-112,604) and a median of 112 events (range: 8-5,142); 53% reported a P-value <0.01. The median Fragility Index was 8 (range: 0-109); 25% had a Fragility Index of 3 or less. In 53% of trials, the Fragility Index was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up.

Conclusion: The statistically significant results of many RCTs hinge on small numbers of events. The Fragility Index complements the P-value and helps identify less robust results.

Keywords: Lost to follow-up; Randomized controlled trials; Research methodology.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review

MeSH terms

Data Interpretation, Statistical*
Humans
Lost to Follow-Up
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic*
Sample Size