Hypofractionated breast cancer radiotherapy. Helical tomotherapy in supine position or classic 3D-conformal radiotherapy in prone position: which is better?

Anticancer Res. 2014 Mar;34(3):1233-8.

Abstract

We propose a comparative dosimetric study of whole-breast hypofractionated radiation therapy using helical tomotherapy (HT) in supine position and 3-D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prone position. Twelve patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy were retrospectively selected from October to December 2012. Specific dose-volume parameters were selected for the study. The target coverage was adequate in all patients for both techniques. Significant differences in lung dose distribution were observed: maximum dose (mean value over the 12 plans) was 23.41 Gy in HT plans and 6.65 Gy in 3D-CRT; V20 (i.e. the lung volume receiving 20 Gy) was 0.31% in HT plans and 0.0% in 3D-CRT plans. The mean dose to the heart was 5.57 Gy and 0.93 Gy, respectively. The differences between the two techniques were significant (p<0.05) only for some parameters. We noted better results in the prone position, but with HT, dose constraints were mentioned for the whole set of considered organs.

Keywords: 3D conformal radiation therapy; Hypofractionated radiation therapy; helical tomotherapy; prone treatment position; supine treatment position.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Breast Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Dose Fractionation, Radiation*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional*
  • Middle Aged
  • Organs at Risk
  • Prognosis
  • Prone Position
  • Radiometry
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
  • Radiotherapy, Conformal*
  • Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Supine Position