Methotrexate vs. ciclosporin in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis in children: a critical appraisal

Br J Dermatol. 2014 Mar;170(3):496-8; discussion 498-9. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12820.

Abstract

Aim: El-Khalawany et al. (Eur J Pediatr 2012; 172: 351-6) aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of methotrexate vs. ciclosporin in the treatment of children with severe atopic eczema.

Setting and design: This multicentre, parallel group (ratio 1 : 1), randomized controlled trial was conducted in a secondary care setting in Egypt.

Study exposure: Children with severe atopic eczema were randomly assigned to receive either methotrexate (7.5 mg weekly) or ciclosporin (2.5 mg kg(-1) daily) for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up period.

Outcomes: Eczema severity was measured using the SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index. The authors also recorded the number of patients on each therapy experiencing adverse effects.

Primary outcome measures: The primary outcome was the mean change in SCORAD after 12 weeks of treatment.

Results: Forty patients with a mean age of 11.6 ± 1.52 years were included in the trial. At week 12, patients in the methotrexate group had a mean ± SD absolute reduction in SCORAD of 26.25 ± 7.03, compared with 25.02 ± 8.21 in the ciclosporin group (P = 0.93). Both drugs were associated with minor adverse effects, none of which necessitated changing the treatment regimen.

Conclusions: El-Khalawany et al. conclude that both methotrexate and ciclosporin in low doses are clinically effective, relatively safe, and well tolerated as treatments for severe atopic eczema in children.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Cyclosporine / therapeutic use*
  • Dermatitis, Atopic / drug therapy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Methotrexate / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Cyclosporine
  • Methotrexate