Identification of parasitic communities within European ticks using next-generation sequencing

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Mar 27;8(3):e2753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002753. eCollection 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Risk assessment of tick-borne and zoonotic disease emergence necessitates sound knowledge of the particular microorganisms circulating within the communities of these major vectors. Assessment of pathogens carried by wild ticks must be performed without a priori, to allow for the detection of new or unexpected agents.

Methodology/principal findings: We evaluated the potential of Next-Generation Sequencing techniques (NGS) to produce an inventory of parasites carried by questing ticks. Sequences corresponding to parasites from two distinct genera were recovered in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in Eastern France: Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. Four Babesia species were identified, three of which were zoonotic: B. divergens, Babesia sp. EU1 and B. microti; and one which infects cattle, B. major. This is the first time that these last two species have been identified in France. This approach also identified new sequences corresponding to as-yet unknown organisms similar to tropical Theileria species.

Conclusions/significance: Our findings demonstrate the capability of NGS to produce an inventory of live tick-borne parasites, which could potentially be transmitted by the ticks, and uncovers unexpected parasites in Western Europe.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Babesia / isolation & purification
  • Babesia / parasitology*
  • Biodiversity*
  • France
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / methods*
  • Parasites / classification*
  • Parasites / genetics*
  • Parasitology / methods*
  • Theileria / isolation & purification
  • Theileria / parasitology*

Grants and funding

This study was partially funded by EU grant FP7-261504 EDENext and is catalogued by the EDENext Steering Committee as EDENext 097 (http://www.edenext.eu). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and don't necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Financial aid was also provided by the DIM Ile de France, the CoVetLab partner institutes, the ANSES, the Animal Health department of INRA and the INRA Metaprogram MEM and the PathoID project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.