Patient, carer and professional perspectives on barriers and facilitators to quality care in advanced heart failure

PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e93288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093288. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background: Those with advanced heart failure (HF) experience high levels of morbidity and mortality, similar to common cancers. However, there remains evidence of inequity of access to palliative care services compared to people with cancer. This study examines patient, carer, and professional perspectives on current management of advanced HF and barriers and facilitators to improved care.

Methods: Qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews and focus groups with advanced HF patients (n = 30), carers (n = 20), and professionals (n = 65). Data analysed using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) as the underpinning conceptual framework.

Findings: Uncertainty is ubiquitous in accounts from advanced HF patients and their caregivers. This uncertainty relates to understanding of the implications of their diagnosis, appropriate treatments, and when and how to seek effective help. Health professionals agree this is a major problem but feel they lack knowledge, opportunities, or adequate support to improve the situation. Fragmented care with lack of coordination and poor communication makes life difficult. Poor understanding of the condition extends to the wider circle of carers and means that requests for help may not be perceived as legitimate, and those with advanced HF are not prioritised for social and financial supports. Patient and caregiver accounts of emergency care are uniformly poor. Managing polypharmacy and enduring concomitant side effects is a major burden, and the potential for rationalisation exists. This study has potential limitations because it was undertaken within a single geographical location within the United Kingdom.

Conclusions: Little progress is being made to improve care experiences for those with advanced HF. Even in the terminal stages, patients and caregivers are heavily and unnecessarily burdened by health care services that are poorly coordinated and offer fragmented care. There is evidence that these poor experiences could be improved to a large extent by simple organisational rather than complex clinical mechanisms.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Caregivers / organization & administration
  • Caregivers / psychology*
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Heart Failure / psychology*
  • Heart Failure / therapy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Palliative Care / economics
  • Palliative Care / organization & administration
  • Palliative Care / psychology*
  • Qualitative Research
  • Quality of Health Care / economics
  • Quality of Health Care / organization & administration*
  • United Kingdom

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the Caring Together programme (http://www.mariecurie.org.uk/caring), a partnership between Marie Curie Cancer Care, British Heart Foundation, and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.