Sevelamer is cost effective versus calcium carbonate for the first-line treatment of hyperphosphatemia in new patients to hemodialysis: a patient-level economic evaluation of the INDEPENDENT-HD study

J Nephrol. 2015 Oct;28(5):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0122-8. Epub 2014 Jul 16.

Abstract

Background: The recent multicenter, randomized, open-label INDEPENDENT study demonstrated that sevelamer improves survival in new to hemodialysis (HD) patients compared with calcium carbonate. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of sevelamer versus calcium carbonate for patients new to HD, using patient-level data from the INDEPENDENT study.

Study design: Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Setting and population: Adult patients new to HD in Italy.

Model, perspective, timeframe: A patient-level cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Servizio Sanitario Nazionale, Italy's national health service. The analysis was conducted for a 3-year time horizon. The cost of dialysis was excluded from the base case analysis.

Intervention: Sevelamer was compared to calcium carbonate.

Outcomes: Total life years (LYs), total costs, and the incremental cost per LY gained were calculated. Bootstrapping was used to estimate confidence intervals around LYs, costs, and cost-effectiveness and to calculate the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Results: Sevelamer was associated with a gain of 0.26 in LYs compared to calcium carbonate, over the 3-year time horizon. Total drug costs were €3,282 higher for sevelamer versus calcium carbonate, while total hospitalization costs were €2,020 lower for sevelamer versus calcium carbonate. The total incremental cost of sevelamer versus calcium carbonate was €1,262, resulting in a cost per LY gained of €4,897. The bootstrap analysis demonstrated that sevelamer was cost effective compared with calcium carbonate in 99.4 % of 10,000 bootstrap replicates, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000 per LY gained.

Limitations: Data on hospitalizations was taken from a post hoc retrospective chart review of the patients included in the INDEPENDENT study. Patient quality of life or health utility was not included in the analysis.

Conclusions: Sevelamer is a cost-effective alternative to calcium carbonate for the first-line treatment of hyperphosphatemia in new to HD patients in Italy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00710788.

Keywords: Calcium carbonate; Chronic kidney disease; Cost effectiveness; Dialysis; Hyperphosphatemia; Sevelamer.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antacids / administration & dosage
  • Antacids / economics
  • Calcium Carbonate / administration & dosage*
  • Calcium Carbonate / economics
  • Chelating Agents / administration & dosage
  • Chelating Agents / economics
  • Cost of Illness*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hyperphosphatemia / drug therapy*
  • Hyperphosphatemia / epidemiology
  • Hyperphosphatemia / etiology
  • Italy
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / complications
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / economics
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Renal Dialysis*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sevelamer / administration & dosage*
  • Sevelamer / economics
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antacids
  • Chelating Agents
  • Sevelamer
  • Calcium Carbonate

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00710788