Background: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in the newborn period is a potential cause of serious morbidity and mortality in individuals with hemophilia. The incidence of ICH is estimated to be 2% to 4%; however, depending on the mode of delivery, it may be considerably higher. Considering the varying sensitivities and costs of various imaging modalities, there remains controversy surrounding universal cranial imaging. Cost-utility analysis is the ideal tool to display the consequences of a decision made.
Methods: We constructed a decision tree to evaluate the direct and indirect costs, possible outcomes, and probabilities of ICH in neonates with hemophilia. We created 3 decision analysis models to evaluate the cost-utility of different screening modalities for ICH: ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Within each model, 3 different strategies were compared: screen all neonates; screen only neonates born by instrumented delivery; and not screen any neonates. A societal perspective was used for all models. The base case models were later reanalyzed in sensitivity analysis to account for uncertainties.
Results: Total costs for screening all neonates, screening only neonates born by instrumented delivery, and not screening any neonates were $9501, $9297, and $9347, respectively, for US, and $9761, $9351, and $9353, respectively, for CT. Screening instrumented deliveries using MRI had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12,440.
Conclusions: Screening newborns born by an instrumented delivery appears to be the most cost-effective strategy irrespective of the imaging modality. Subsequent studies will require a longer time frame to factor in possible late effects of radiation, anesthesia, and the high cost of factor replacement and hospital admission.