Meta-analysis of best corrected visual acuity after treatment for myopic choroidal neovascularisation

Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug 18;7(4):720-5. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.04.25. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between Verteporfin with photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

Method: Published literature from Medline, Premedline, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception until November 2013 were retrieved. All studies evaluating the BCVA between Verteporfin with PDT and intravitreal anti-VEGF for myopic CNV were included. The results were pooled using mean difference (MD), a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: Finally, five studies enrolled 349 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. We inferred that the BCVA of myopic CNV after the treatment of anti-VEGF was significantly better compared with Verteporfin with PDT (MD=0.25, 95%CI:0.17-0.33, Z=5.97, P<0.00001).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that intravitreal anti-VEGF could have a better BCVA after treatment than Verteporfin with PDT for myopic CNV.

Keywords: Verteporfin with photodynamic therapy; anti–vascular endothelial growth factor; meta-analysis; myopic choroidal neovascularization.