Differentiation of low-attenuation intracranial hemorrhage and calcification using dual-energy computed tomography in a phantom system

Invest Radiol. 2015 Jan;50(1):9-16. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000089.

Abstract

Objectives: Calcific and hemorrhagic intracranial lesions with attenuation levels of less than 100 Hounsfield units (HUs) cannot currently be reliably differentiated by single-energy computed tomography (SECT). The proper differentiation of these lesion types would have a multitude of clinical applications. A phantom model was used to test the ability of dual-energy CT (DECT) to differentiate such lesions.

Materials and methods: Agar gel-bound ferric oxide and hydroxyapatite were used to model hemorrhage and calcification, respectively. Gel models were scanned using SECT and DECT and organized into SECT attenuation-matched pairs at 16 attenuation levels between 0 and 100 HU. Dual-energy CT data were analyzed using 3-dimensional (3D) Gaussian mixture models (GMMs), as well as a simplified threshold plane metric derived from the 3D GMM, to assign voxels to hemorrhagic or calcific categories. Accuracy was calculated by comparing predicted voxel assignments with actual voxel identities.

Results: We measured 6032 voxels from each gel model, for a total of 193,024 data points (16 matched model pairs). Both the 3D GMM and its more clinically implementable threshold plane derivative yielded similar results, with higher than 90% accuracy at matched SECT attenuation levels of 50 HU and greater.

Conclusions: Hemorrhagic and calcific lesions with attenuation levels between 50 and 100 HU were differentiable using DECT in a clinically relevant phantom system with higher than 90% accuracy. This method warrants further testing for potential clinical applications.

MeSH terms

  • Calcinosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods
  • Intracranial Hemorrhages / diagnostic imaging*
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*