Measured resection versus gap balancing technique for femoral rotational alignment: a prospective study

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Aug;22(2):158-62. doi: 10.1177/230949901402200208.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the measured resection technique and the gap balancing technique for correction of the femoral rotational alignment.

Methods: 57 women and 6 men (mean age, 70 years) with end-stage osteoarthritis and <15º malalignment and <10º flexion contracture of the knee underwent primary total knee arthroplasty through the medial approach using the measured resection technique (n=34) or the gap balancing technique (n=29). Femoral rotational alignment was evaluated before and 7 days after surgery using computed tomography by referencing the 2 posterior condyles to the transepicondylar axis.

Results: The 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of correction of the femoral rotational alignment (3.4º ± 1.4º vs. 3.5º ± 3.1º, p=0.817).

Conclusion: The measured resection and the gap balancing techniques achieved comparable correction of femoral rotational alignment.

Keywords: arthroplasty, replacement, knee; knee prosthesis.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / methods*
  • Bone Malalignment / complications
  • Bone Malalignment / diagnostic imaging
  • Bone Malalignment / surgery*
  • Female
  • Femur / surgery
  • Humans
  • Knee Prosthesis*
  • Male
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee / complications
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee / diagnostic imaging
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee / surgery*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiography
  • Tibia / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome