Health and cost benefits associated with the use of metoprolol in heart attack patients

Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;7(6):687-9. doi: 10.1586/17512433.2014.960847. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

Abstract

Heart attack (myocardial infarction) is a highly prevalent entity worldwide. Widespread implementation of reperfusion strategies has dramatically reduced the mortality associated with infarction. Paradoxically, the mortality reduction has significantly increased the incidence of chronic heart failure (HF). Treatment of HF, once present, represents a huge socioeconomic burden on individuals and healthcare systems. The possibility of preventing rather than treating post-infarction HF would be of paramount importance. Given that infarct size is the main determinant of adverse post-infarction outcomes (including chronic HF), therapies able to reduce infarct size are needed. The single administration of intravenous metoprolol before reperfusion has been recently shown to reduce infarct size and reduce the cases of chronic HF in a proof-of-concept trial. If confirmed in larger trials, this low-cost therapy is expected to have a major health and socioeconomic impact.

Keywords: cost–effectiveness; heart failure; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; infarct size; left ventricular ejection fraction; metoprolol; mortality; myocardial infarction; β-blocker.

Publication types

  • Editorial

MeSH terms

  • Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists / economics
  • Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use
  • Cost of Illness
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Costs
  • Heart Failure / economics
  • Heart Failure / etiology
  • Heart Failure / prevention & control*
  • Humans
  • Metoprolol / economics
  • Metoprolol / therapeutic use*
  • Myocardial Infarction / complications
  • Myocardial Infarction / drug therapy*
  • Myocardial Infarction / economics
  • Myocardial Reperfusion / methods

Substances

  • Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists
  • Metoprolol