Development, reliability and validity of Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50)

Chin J Integr Med. 2017 May;23(5):350-356. doi: 10.1007/s11655-014-1853-z. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a health-evaluating scale from a Chinese medicine (CM) perspective and reflecting CM conception of health.

Methods: The Traditional Chinese Medicine Health Self-Evaluation Scale (TCM-50) was developed by verification of dimensions, formation of item pool, verification of scoring methodology, and pilot test of scale and item analysis.

Results: TCM-50 composed of 50 items that could be classified into 4 dimensions including physiology and health, psychology and health, nature and health, and society and health. An examination of reliability and validity of TCM-50 yielded Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.927, and half coefficient of was 0.876. The intraclass correlation coefficient of total score was 0.912. After using SF-36 questionnaire to evaluate the criterion validity, the Pearson of the score of the two scales from the same participant was 0.740.

Conclusions: TCM-50 has good reliability and validity, and can yield similar levels of efficacy as SF-36 in terms of evaluating people's overall health level. As a scale based on CM theory, TCM-50 is suitable for self-measuring the general health of Chinese patients.

Keywords: Chinese medicine; TCM-50; health status; reliability; scale; validity.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Calibration
  • Diagnostic Self Evaluation*
  • Female
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medicine, Chinese Traditional*
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult