Automated analysis of hip joint cartilage combining MR T2 and three-dimensional fast-spin-echo images

Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan;75(1):403-13. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25598. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a fully automated scheme to extract biochemical information from the hip joint cartilages using MR T2 mapping images incorporating segmentation of co-registered three-dimensional Fast-Spin-Echo (3D-SPACE) images.

Methods: Manual analyses of unilateral hip (3 Tesla) MR images of 24 asymptomatic volunteers were used to validate a 3D deformable model method for automated cartilage segmentation of SPACE scans, partitioning of the individual femoral and acetabular cartilage plates into clinically defined sub-regions and propagating these results to T2 maps to calculate region-wise T2 value statistics. Analyses were completed on a desktop computer (∼ 10 min per case).

Results: The mean voxel overlap between automated A and manual M segmentations of the cartilage volumes in the (clinically based) SPACE images was 73% (100 × 2|A∩M|/[|A|+|M|]). The automated and manual analyses demonstrated a relative difference error <10% in the median "T2 average signal" for each cartilage plate. The automated and manual analyses showed consistent patterns between significant differences in T2 data across the hip cartilage sub-regions.

Conclusion: The good agreement between the manual and automatic analyses of T2 values indicates the use of structural 3D-SPACE MR images with the proposed method provides a promising approach for automated quantitative T2 assessment of hip joint cartilages.

Keywords: 3D-SPACE; Active Shape Models; Graph-Cuts; Hip; T2 mapping.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Algorithms
  • Cartilage, Articular / anatomy & histology*
  • Echo-Planar Imaging / methods*
  • Female
  • Hip Joint / anatomy & histology*
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional / methods*
  • Male
  • Pattern Recognition, Automated / methods*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Subtraction Technique
  • Young Adult