Background: The ideal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is under debate. Lesion length is a well-recognized predictor of PCI complexity and long-term outcome.
Aim: To evaluate the determinants and impact on outcome of long-term DAPT in a retrospective cohort of patients treated for a long coronary lesion.
Methods: Patients (n=460) who underwent PCI for a long lesion (>30 mm) were divided into two groups according to antiplatelet regimen at 1 year: patients who stopped DAPT before 1 year (single antiplatelet therapy group; n=168) and patients who continued DAPT for longer than 1 year (n=292).
Results: Mean lesion length was 35.7±7.1 mm. The proportion of patients who continued DAPT after 1 year was 63.5%. The main determinants of long-term DAPT were initial presentation as myocardial infarction and implantation of a drug-eluting stent. Median follow-up was 37.4 (23-51) months after the 1-year period following the index PCI. Long-term DAPT was highly associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by multivariable analysis and after adjustment for other predictors: hazard ratios 0.11 (95% confidence interval 0.03-0.32) and 0.15 (95% confidence interval 0.04-0.62), respectively. No increase in major bleeding was noted.
Conclusion: In a contemporary practice, nearly two-thirds of patients who undergo PCI for a long lesion are treated with DAPT for several years. Our results suggest that long-term DAPT is beneficial in this subset of patients identified as being at high risk.
Keywords: Angioplastie coronaire percutanée; Anti-agrégant plaquettaire; Antiplatelet therapy; Arrêt du clopidogrel; Clopidogrel discontinuation; Double anti-agrégation plaquettaire; Drug-eluting stent; Dual antiplatelet therapy; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Stent actif.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.