Preoperative CT angiography versus Doppler ultrasound mapping of abdominal perforator in DIEP breast reconstructions: A randomized prospective study

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Jun;68(6):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

Abstract

Is there a difference in surgery time and complication rate when Doppler ultrasound (US) is used for the preoperative mapping of perforators in comparison with computer tomography angiography (CTA)? Women who were candidates for breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. The operating time was 249 ± 62 min (mean ± SD) in the CTA group (n = 32) and 255 min ± 75 in the US group (n = 31)--hence a difference of 6 min on average. No flaps were lost. Sixteen complications occurred in 15 patients: seven in the CTA group and nine in the US group. Complications were remedied without delay and all patients came through with a favorable reconstruction. Preoperative mapping of perforators with US is satisfactory enough provided the microsurgery team has proper experience in breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap.

Keywords: Breast reconstruction; CT angiography; DIEP flap; Doppler ultrasound; Surgery time.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Wall / blood supply*
  • Abdominal Wall / diagnostic imaging
  • Adult
  • Angiography* / methods
  • Arteries / diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Learning Curve
  • Mammaplasty / adverse effects
  • Mammaplasty / methods*
  • Middle Aged
  • Multidetector Computed Tomography
  • Operative Time*
  • Perforator Flap / adverse effects
  • Perforator Flap / blood supply*
  • Preoperative Care
  • Prospective Studies
  • Ultrasonography, Doppler*