Strategies for Avoiding Recommendations for Additional Imaging Through a Comprehensive Comparison With Prior Studies

J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jul;12(7):657-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.021. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the frequency and characteristics of recommendations for additional imaging and/or intervention (RAIs) in abdominal CT and MRI interpretations that might be avoided through comprehensive comparison with all available prior examinations.

Methods: A total of 1,006 RAIs in abdominopelvic CT and MRI reports were retrospectively evaluated. Reports and images from each patient's prior imaging examinations, including those of all relevant body parts and modalities, were reviewed to determine if the RAI could have been avoided based on prior imaging. Frequency and characteristics of such "avoidable" RAIs were evaluated.

Results: A total of 41 of 1,006 (4.1%) RAIs were avoidable. The key prior examination that established the RAI as avoidable was a different modality in 53.7% (22 of 41) and on a different body area in 41.5% (17 of 41) of cases, including chest imaging in 31.7% (13 of 41). A total of 83.3% (5 of 6) adrenal RAIs, and 80.0% (4 of 5) liver RAIs were avoidable based on prior chest imaging. The key finding was present on the prior images but was not described in the report in 46.3% (19 of 41) of cases. A greater number of prior examinations were available in cases of avoidable RAIs (mean, 12.2 ± 16.7) than in those of nonavoidable RAIs (mean, 5.7 ± 9.5) (P < .001).

Conclusions: A small fraction of RAIs can be avoided by performing a thorough evaluation of all prior imaging examinations, including different modalities and body parts. Nearly half of the key prior examinations did not report the finding, highlighting the importance of directly reviewing relevant images, particularly chest imaging for evaluation of indeterminate upper-abdominal findings. Configuration of PACS for optimized selection and display of relevant examination reports and images may facilitate such comparisons.

Keywords: Recommendations for additional imaging; incidental findings; practice improvement; quality.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Abdomen*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidental Findings
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / statistics & numerical data*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pelvis*
  • Retreatment*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / statistics & numerical data*
  • Unnecessary Procedures*