Background: Mounting evidence suggests that airway obstruction defined by the lower limit of normal (LLN) of forced expiration volume in 1s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) might be an important predictor of mortality in patients with an FEV1/FVC ratio below 0.70. Although better risk stratification for postoperative outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing thoracic surgery is warranted, whether an FEV1/FVC ratio below 0.70 but above the LLN (i.e., in-between) could identify patients at risk for adverse postoperative outcomes has not been fully evaluated.
Methods: To determine the clinical impact of this "in-between" group of patients with COPD, we evaluated whether classification of the in-between group and the COPD group with FEV1/FVC ratios below 0.70 and below the LLN could provide more accurate risk stratification for postoperative outcomes in COPD patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
Results: The criterion of LLN classified 302 patients with an FEV1/FVC ratio below 0.70 into either the in-between group (124 cases) or the COPD group (178 cases). The COPD group showed a 3-fold increase in prolonged oxygen therapy (POT) and a 50% increase in prolonged postoperative stay (PPS), as compared with the in-between group, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.068 (95% confidence interval: 1.806-5.213) for POT.
Conclusions: Based on the finding that the in-between group could independently identify patients at risk for adverse postoperative outcomes, LLN assessment of the FEV1/FVC ratio might provide more accurate risk stratification in COPD patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
Keywords: 0.70 fixed ratio; Chronic obstructive lung disease; Lower limit of normal; Risk stratification; Thoracic surgery.
Copyright © 2015 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.