Robust and Reproducible Quantification of the Extent of Chest Radiographic Abnormalities (And It's Free!)

PLoS One. 2015 May 21;10(5):e0128044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128044. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Rationale: Objective, reproducible quantification of the extent of abnormalities seen on a chest radiograph would improve the user-friendliness of a previously proposed severity scoring system for pulmonary tuberculosis and could be helpful in monitoring response to therapy, including in clinical trials.

Methods: In this study we report the development and evaluation of a simple tool using free image editing software (GIMP) to accurately and reproducibly quantify the area of affected lung on the chest radiograph of tuberculosis patients. As part of a pharmacokinetic study in Lima, Peru, a chest radiograph was performed on patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and this was subsequently photographed using a digital camera. The GIMP software was used by two independent and trained readers to estimate the extent of affected lung (expressed as a percentage of total lung area) in each radiograph and the resulting radiographic SCORE.

Results: 56 chest radiographs were included in the reading analysis. The Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the 2 observers was 0.977 (p<0.001) for the area of lung affected and was 0.955 (p<0.001) for the final score; and the kappa coefficient of Interobserver agreement for both the area of lung affected and the score were 0.9 (p<0.001) and 0.86 (p<0.001) respectively.

Conclusions: This high level of between-observer agreement suggests that this freely available software could constitute a simple and useful tool for robust evaluation of individual and serial chest radiographs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / methods
  • Lung / diagnostic imaging
  • Lung / pathology
  • Radiography, Thoracic* / methods
  • Radiography, Thoracic* / standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Thorax / pathology*
  • Tuberculosis, Pulmonary / diagnostic imaging
  • Tuberculosis, Pulmonary / drug therapy
  • Tuberculosis, Pulmonary / pathology

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (GA2011-04P). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.