An update on insertable cardiac monitors: examining the latest clinical evidence and technology for arrhythmia management

Continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring has undergone compelling progress over the past decades. Cardiac monitoring has emerged from 12-lead electrocardiograms being performed at the discretion of the treating physician to in-hospital telemetry, Holter monitoring, prolonged external event monitoring and most recently toward insertable device monitoring for several years. Significant advantages and disadvantages pertaining to these monitoring options will be addressed in this review. Insertable cardiac monitors have several advantages over external monitoring techniques and may signify a clinical turning point in the field of arrhythmia management. However, their role in the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic strokes has yet to evolve. This will be the main focus of this review. Issues surrounding patient selection, clinical relevance and determination of cost-effectiveness for prolonged cardiac monitoring require further studies. Furthermore, insertable cardiac monitoring has not only the potential to augment diagnostic capabilities but also to improve the management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.