Clinical pharmacological approach for balancing the use of daptomycin and linezolid in comparison with that of vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-related infections

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015 Aug;13(8):927-37. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1056159. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most challenging bacterial pathogens responsible for severe infections among hospitalized patients. In recent years there is increasing evidence that the clinical efficacy of vancomycin is progressively decreasing. Although daptomycin and linezolid are valuable alternatives to vancomycin for the treatment of MRSA-related bloodstream infections and pneumonia, respectively, a great deal of debate exists about their role in daily clinical practice due to cost-effectiveness issues. In this article we put into perspective the importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) considerations based on recent experimental and clinical data to argue whether they could be helpful in identifying clinical conditions in which these agents could be advantageous as compared to vancomycin.

Keywords: MRSA; bloodstream infections; daptomycin; linezolid; pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic; pneumonia.

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / economics
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology*
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bacteremia / drug therapy
  • Bacteremia / etiology
  • Humans
  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus / drug effects*
  • Pneumonia, Bacterial / drug therapy
  • Pneumonia, Bacterial / etiology
  • Staphylococcal Infections / complications
  • Staphylococcal Infections / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents