Ceftriaxone versus imipenem/cilastatin as empirical monotherapy for infections in cancer patients

Chemotherapy. 1989:35 Suppl 2:10-5. doi: 10.1159/000238733.

Abstract

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with ceftriaxone (active ingredient of Rocephin) (CRO) versus imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) in febrile cancer patients with or without neutropenia. 120 febrile episodes were randomized and 89 (75%) were evaluable for efficacy analysis. The overall response rates to both regimens were good (86 and 79% improved in response to CRO and I/C, respectively). Overall mortality was low and similar in the two groups. Both regimens were well tolerated. Our preliminary data corroborate the efficacy of CRO or I/C as empirical monotherapy for febrile episodes in cancer patients. It will be up to future investigations to show whether one of these regimens is superior to the other.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bacterial Infections / drug therapy*
  • Bacterial Infections / mortality
  • Ceftriaxone / therapeutic use*
  • Cilastatin / therapeutic use*
  • Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination
  • Drug Combinations / therapeutic use
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Imipenem / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neutropenia
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation
  • Remission Induction

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Drug Combinations
  • Cilastatin
  • Imipenem
  • Ceftriaxone
  • Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination