Long-term Outcomes Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: An Analysis of 1082 Cases at Mayo Clinic

Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):602-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate long-term device outcomes following primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation.

Materials and methods: We identified 1802 male patients with stress urinary incontinence that underwent AUS placement from 1983 to 2011. Of these, 1082 (60%) were involving primary implantations and comprise the study cohort. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, defined as any secondary surgery. Patient follow-up was obtained through office examination, operative report, and written or telephone correspondence.

Results: Patients undergoing AUS implantation had a median age of 71 years (interquartile range 66-76) and median follow-up of 4.1 years (interquartile range 0.8-7.7). Overall, 338 of 1082 patients (31.2%) underwent secondary surgery, including 89 for device infection and/or erosion, 131 for device malfunction, 89 for urethral atrophy, and 29 for pump malposition or tubing complications. No patient-related risk factors were independently associated with an increased risk of secondary surgery on multivariable analysis. Secondary surgery-free survival was 90% at 1 year, 74% at 5 years, 57% at 10 years, and 41% at 15 years.

Conclusion: Primary AUS implantation is associated with acceptable long-term outcomes. Recognition of long-term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Minnesota / epidemiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / epidemiology
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / physiopathology
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / surgery*
  • Urinary Sphincter, Artificial*
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male / methods*