Two-year results of a randomized, phase III comparative trial of telbivudine versus lamivudine in Chinese patients

Purpose: The burden of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in China, where prevalence exceeds 7 %. This was a randomized, double-blinded, phase III study of the efficacy and safety of telbivudine and lamivudine treatment at 104 weeks in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Methods: Hepatitis B e antigen-positive (n = 290) and -negative (n = 42) adults with nucleoside analog-naïve compensated chronic hepatitis B were randomized to receive telbivudine 600 mg/day or lamivudine 100 mg/day for 104 weeks. The primary endpoint was reduction from baseline in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA at week 52. Week 104 analyses included HBV DNA reductions, undetectable HBV DNA (<300 copies/mL), ALT normalization, and e-antigen loss/seroconversion. Efficacy at week 104 was also assessed as a function of week 24 HBV DNA.

Results: In the intention-to-treat population (n = 332) at week 104, telbivudine was superior to lamivudine for reduction of HBV DNA [-5.48 vs. -4.00 log10 copies/mL; difference -1.49 log10 (95 % confidence interval -2.2, -0.8); p < 0.0001], for the proportion with undetectable HBV DNA (61.9 vs. 38.5 %; p < 0.0001), for ALT normalization (75.8 vs. 61.3 %; p = 0.0049), and for e-antigen loss (39.9 vs. 28.2 %; p = 0.0373). The cumulative probability of genotypic drug resistance was 15.4 % on telbivudine versus 23.6 % on lamivudine through week 104. Early virologic response at week 24 was associated with improved outcomes at week 104. Adverse events were similar to those seen in the GLOBE study.

Conclusions: Telbivudine is superior to lamivudine over 2 years of chronic hepatitis B treatment in Chinese patients.