Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bordetella bronchiseptica Isolates from Swine and Companion Animals and Detection of Resistance Genes

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0135703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135703. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Bordetella bronchiseptica causes infections of the respiratory tract in swine and other mammals and is a precursor for secondary infections with Pasteurella multocida. Treatment of B. bronchiseptica infections is conducted primarily with antimicrobial agents. Therefore it is essential to get an overview of the susceptibility status of these bacteria. The aim of this study was to comparatively analyse broth microdilution susceptibility testing according to CLSI recommendations with an incubation time of 16 to 20 hours and a longer incubation time of 24 hours, as recently proposed to obtain more homogenous MICs. Susceptibility testing against a panel of 22 antimicrobial agents and two fixed combinations was performed with 107 porcine isolates from different farms and regions in Germany and 43 isolates obtained from companion animals in Germany and other European countries. Isolates with increased MICs were investigated by PCR assays for the presence of resistance genes. For ampicillin, all 107 porcine isolates were classified as resistant, whereas only a single isolate was resistant to florfenicol. All isolates obtained from companion animals showed elevated MICs for β-lactam antibiotics and demonstrated an overall low susceptibility to cephalosporines. Extension of the incubation time resulted in 1-2 dilution steps higher MIC50 values of porcine isolates for seven antimicrobial agents tested, while isolates from companion animals exhibited twofold higher MIC50/90 values only for tetracycline and cefotaxime. For three antimicrobial agents, lower MIC50 and MIC90 values were detected for both, porcine and companion animal isolates. Among the 150 isolates tested, the resistance genes blaBOR-1 (n = 147), blaOXA-2, (n = 4), strA and strB (n = 17), sul1 (n = 10), sul2 (n = 73), dfrA7 (n = 3) and tet(A) (n = 8) were detected and a plasmid localisation was identified for several of the resistance genes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology*
  • Bordetella bronchiseptica / drug effects*
  • Cephalosporins / pharmacology
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Pets / microbiology
  • Swine / microbiology
  • Thiamphenicol / analogs & derivatives
  • Thiamphenicol / pharmacology
  • beta-Lactams / pharmacology

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Cephalosporins
  • beta-Lactams
  • florfenicol
  • Thiamphenicol

Grants and funding

This study was financially supported by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) through the German Antibiotics Resistance Strategy (DART) project (grant number FKZ 2811HS010). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Vet Med Labor GmbH provided support in the form of a salary for author PAK, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific role of this author is articulated in the author contributions section.